ANTICOAGULATION AND SPINE PROCEDURES

ANTICOAGULATION AND SPINE PROCEDURES

Scott Bainbridge, MD; Drew Trainor, DO

ANTICOAGULATION AND SPINE PROCEDURES 4.15.17

ASRA Anticoag Guidelines

The decision to take a patient off anticoagulation for an elective pain procedure requires special consideration of multiple distinct factors. The goal is to help alleviate the patient’s pain through procedural intervention, but to do so in a way that minimizes patient risk. The factors to be considered include the risk of the procedure being performed, the indication for anticoagulation (and the risk of an adverse event if the patient is taken off their medication), and the half-life of the anticoagulant. It is sometimes riskier to hold the anticoagulants than to do the procedure while taking them.1, 2 PATIENTS SHOULD NOT TAKE THEMSELVES OFF ANTICOAGULANT MEDICATION WITHOUT DIRECTION FROM THEIR PRESCRIBING DOCTOR/PRACTITIONER.

 

Several different expert recommendations have been developed to guide anticoagulation management for pain procedures. Through careful and thoughtful discussions, the providers at Denver Back Pain Specialists (DBPS) made the decision to adopt a blended set of the more conservative guidelines in the literature today (see below). This took into consideration recommendations from the Spine Intervention Society3 and American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA)4, as well as related clinical research publications1, 2.

 

The American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA) developed an expert panel to provide recommendations on anticoagulation.  Committee members stratified interventional spine and pain procedures by potential bleeding risk as low-, intermediate-, and high-risk procedures. An extensive review of the current literature was performed. The recommendations were evidence-based when possible and pharmacologically driven when no solid evidence existed. These recommendations were published in the May-June 2015 issue of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. Please see the attached table outlining these recommendations.

 

Once the decision has been made that the patient should be taken off their anticoagulant prior to the planned procedure, the next important question to answer is whether it is safe for the patient to be off their anticoagulation for the duration outlined by the ASRA 2015 guidelines. This requires a critical risk assessment by the prescribing provider. The health care providers at DBPS will not make the decision to take a patient off their anticoagulation, but will defer the decision to the primary care provider or specialist who is managing the patient’s anticoagulation.

TABLE 1. Pain Procedure Classification According to the Potential Risk for Serious Bleed

High-Risk Procedures:

SCS trial and implant

Intrathecal catheter and pump implant

Vertebral augmentation (vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty)

Epiduroscopy and epidural decompression

 

Intermediate-Risk Procedures*:

Interlaminar ESIs (C, T, L, S)

Transforaminal ESIs (C, T, L, S), Medial Branch RFA (C, T, L) Paravertebral block (C, T, L) Intra-discal procedures (C, T, L) Sympathetic blocks (stellate, thoracic, splanchnic, celiac, lumbar, hypogastric)

Peripheral nerve stimulation trial and implant Pocket revision and IPG/ITP replacement

 

Low-Risk Procedures*:

Peripheral nerve blocks

Peripheral joints and musculoskeletal injections

Trigger point injections including piriformis injection

Sacroiliac joint injection and sacral lateral branch blocks

Facet and Medial Branch Blocks (C, T, L)

 

*Patients with high risk for bleeding undergoing low- or intermediate-risk procedures should be treated as intermediate or high risk, respectively. Patients with high risk for bleeding may include old age, history of bleeding tendency, concurrent uses of other anticoagulants/antiplatelets, liver cirrhosis or advanced liver disease, and advanced renal disease.

C indicates cervical; L, lumbar; MBNB, medial branch nerve block; RFA, radiofrequency ablation; S, sacral; T, thoracic.

© 2015 American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine

 

  1. Endres S, Shufelt A, Bogduk N. The Risks of Continuing or Discontinuing Anticoagulants for Patients Undergoing Common Interventional Pain Procedures. Pain Med. 2017;18(3):403-409.
  2. Manchikanti L, Falco FJ, Benyamin RM, Caraway DL, Kaye AD, Helm S, 2nd, Wargo BW, Hansen H, Parr AT, Singh V, Swicegood JR, Smith HS, Schultz DM, Malla Y, Hirsch JA. Assessment of bleeding risk of interventional techniques: a best evidence synthesis of practice patterns and perioperative management of anticoagulant and antithrombotic therapy. Pain Physician. 2013;16(2 Suppl):SE261-318.
  3. Bogduk N, International Spine Intervention Society. Practice guidelines for spinal diagnostic and treatment procedures. Second edition. ed. San Francisco: International Spine Intervention Society; 2013.
  4. Narouze S, Benzon HT, Provenzano DA, Buvanendran A, De Andres J, Deer TR, Rauck R, Huntoon MA. Interventional spine and pain procedures in patients on antiplatelet and anticoagulant medications: guidelines from the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy, the American Academy of Pain Medicine, the International Neuromodulation Society, the North American Neuromodulation Society, and the World Institute of Pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015;40(3):182-212.